Skip to article frontmatterSkip to article content
Site not loading correctly?

This may be due to an incorrect BASE_URL configuration. See the MyST Documentation for reference.

5.2. Third Law

Course-wide Conventions & Notation

Overview and Learning Objectives

The first and second laws tell us how energy and entropy change but leave the entropy scale with an undetermined reference point — the integration constant in ΔS=∫δqrev/T\Delta S = \int \delta q_{\mathrm{rev}}/T is never fixed. The third law resolves this by specifying what happens to entropy as T→0T \to 0. Using Boltzmann’s formula (Section 4.3), we explain why an ideal crystal has S(0)=0S(0) = 0, examine how ground-state degeneracy or frozen-in disorder produces a nonzero residual entropy, and note two further consequences: heat capacities must vanish as T→0T \to 0, and absolute zero itself is unattainable in a finite number of steps.

With the entropy reference point fixed, we can compute absolute (third-law) entropies S∘(T)S^\circ(T) for any substance by integrating CP/TC_P/T from 0 to TT and adding any phase-transition contributions. These absolute entropies are the basis for tabulated ΔrS∘\Delta_r S^\circ and ΔrG∘\Delta_r G^\circ values that we will put to use in Section 5.3.


Learning objectives:

Core Ideas and Derivations

Third law of thermodynamics

Planck’s statement

Planck’s statement of the third law:

As T→0 KT \to 0\,\mathrm{K}, the entropy of any pure crystalline substance tends to a constant.

A key special case is the ideal (perfect) crystal — one with no defects (no vacancies, impurities, grain boundaries, or stacking faults). For an ideal crystal, the constant is taken to be zero:

S(0 K)=0(ideal crystal).S(0\,\mathrm{K}) = 0 \quad \text{(ideal crystal)}.

Why the ideal crystal has S(0)=0S(0) = 0

Recall from Section 4.3 that Boltzmann’s formula gives the entropy of an isolated system as

S=kBln⁡Ω,S = k_{\mathrm B}\ln\Omega,

where Ω\Omega is the number of microstates compatible with the macroscopic constraints. An ideal crystal at 0 K0\,\mathrm{K} has a unique ground-state arrangement: every atom sits at its designated lattice site in a single, perfectly ordered configuration. That means Ω0=1\Omega_0 = 1, so

S(0)=kBln⁡1=0.S(0) = k_{\mathrm B}\ln 1 = 0.

The third law, from the statistical-mechanical viewpoint, is the statement that a system with a unique ground state has zero entropy at absolute zero.

Real crystals: defects and disorder

Real materials can deviate from this picture. Even at very low temperature, a crystal may contain — or “freeze in” — structural or chemical disorder: vacancies, impurities, grain boundaries, stacking faults, or orientational disorder of molecular units. These imperfections increase the number of distinct microscopic arrangements compatible with the same macroscopic state (i.e., increase Ω0\Omega_0), leading to a nonzero entropy as T→0T \to 0.


Residual entropy

If a system retains more than one accessible microscopic arrangement as T→0T \to 0, its entropy approaches a nonzero constant called the residual entropy:

Sres=lim⁡T→0 S(T)=kBln⁡Ω0.S_{\mathrm{res}} = \lim_{T\to 0}\,S(T) = k_{\mathrm B}\ln\Omega_0.

Example: orientational disorder in solid CO

Solid CO at very low temperature provides a classic example. The CO molecule has a small dipole moment, and the two orientations CO and OC are nearly isoenergetic. If each of NN molecules can be frozen in either orientation with roughly equal probability, the ground-state multiplicity is

Ω0=2N,\Omega_0 = 2^N,

and the residual entropy is

Sres=kBln⁡(2N)=NkBln⁡2.S_{\mathrm{res}} = k_{\mathrm B}\ln(2^N) = Nk_{\mathrm B}\ln 2.

Per mole, using R=NAkBR = N_Ak_{\mathrm B}:

Sres,m=Rln⁡2≈5.76 J mol−1 K−1.S_{\mathrm{res,m}} = R\ln 2 \approx 5.76\ \mathrm{J\,mol^{-1}\,K^{-1}}.

Reconciling residual entropy with the third law

Planck’s statement says S→S \to a constant as T→0T \to 0, not that the constant must be zero.

Residual entropy is not a violation of the third law — it reflects that the system is not a perfectly ordered crystal at 0 K0\,\mathrm{K}. The third law’s practical utility lies in establishing a universal reference point for entropy: any ideal crystal has S(0)=0S(0) = 0, and deviations from zero are ascribed to measurable disorder.


Consequence: heat capacities vanish as T→0T \to 0

The third law has a direct implication for heat capacities. At constant pressure, the entropy at temperature TT is related to the entropy at 0 K0\,\mathrm{K} by

S(T)=S(0)+∫0TCP(T′)T′ dT′.S(T) = S(0) + \int_0^T \frac{C_P(T')}{T'}\,dT'.

For this integral to converge (i.e., for S(T)S(T) to be finite), CPC_P must go to zero at least as fast as TT does. More precisely:

CP→0asT→0.C_P \to 0 \quad \text{as} \quad T \to 0.

The same argument applies to CVC_V. This is a nontrivial prediction: it says that the ability of any substance to absorb heat must diminish as absolute zero is approached.


Consequence: unattainability of absolute zero

A closely related statement — sometimes called the Nernst form of the third law — is that no finite sequence of thermodynamic operations can bring a system to exactly T=0 KT = 0\,\mathrm{K}.

The intuitive argument is as follows. Cooling typically works by removing entropy (e.g., by adiabatic demagnetization or expansion). As T→0T \to 0, the entropy of the system approaches a minimum, and each successive cooling step removes less and less entropy — the “gap” between successive stages shrinks and the process converges but never quite reaches zero. In practice, temperatures below 1 nK1\ \mathrm{nK} have been achieved in laboratory settings, but T=0T = 0 remains a limit, not an endpoint.


Absolute entropies

With S(0)=0S(0) = 0 established for ideal crystals, we can compute the absolute (third-law) entropy of any substance at temperature TT and pressure P∘P^\circ:

S∘(T)=∫0TCP(T′)T′ dT′+∑transitionsΔHtrsTtrs,S^\circ(T) = \int_0^T \frac{C_P(T')}{T'}\,dT' + \sum_{\text{transitions}} \frac{\Delta H_{\mathrm{trs}}}{T_{\mathrm{trs}}},

where the sum runs over any phase transitions (melting, boiling, etc.) between 0 and TT, each contributing ΔHtrs/Ttrs\Delta H_{\mathrm{trs}}/T_{\mathrm{trs}} to the entropy.

These absolute entropies are tabulated in standard references (NIST WebBook, JANAF tables) as S∘(298.15 K)S^\circ(298.15\ \mathrm{K}). Combined with standard enthalpies of formation, they provide the reaction entropies and Gibbs energies that we will use in Section 5.3 to analyze the Haber–Bosch process.


Worked Examples

Example 1: Residual entropy of solid CO

Problem. Solid CO has NN molecules per crystal, each of which can adopt either of two orientations (CO or OC) as T→0T \to 0. Estimate the molar residual entropy assuming complete disorder.

Solution.

If all 2N2^N orientational configurations are equally accessible, then Ω0=2N\Omega_0 = 2^N and

Sres=kBln⁡(2N)=NkBln⁡2.S_{\mathrm{res}} = k_{\mathrm B}\ln(2^N) = Nk_{\mathrm B}\ln 2.

Per mole:

Sres,m=Rln⁡2=(8.314 J mol−1 K−1)ln⁡2=5.76 J mol−1 K−1.S_{\mathrm{res,m}} = R\ln 2 = (8.314\ \mathrm{J\,mol^{-1}\,K^{-1}})\ln 2 = 5.76\ \mathrm{J\,mol^{-1}\,K^{-1}}.

Result. Even as T→0T \to 0, a disordered crystal can retain a finite entropy determined by the degeneracy of its ground state. The experimental value (≈4.6 J mol−1 K−1\approx 4.6\ \mathrm{J\,mol^{-1}\,K^{-1}}) is somewhat smaller, indicating partial orientational ordering.


Example 2: Residual entropy of ice (Pauling model)

Problem. In Linus Pauling’s 1935 model of ice, each oxygen atom is tetrahedrally coordinated to four neighbors, with two hydrogen atoms nearby (covalent O–H bonds) and two farther away (hydrogen bonds). Pauling showed that the number of configurations consistent with the “ice rules” (exactly two H atoms close to each O) gives a ground-state multiplicity of approximately Ω0≈(3/2)N\Omega_0 \approx (3/2)^N for NN water molecules. Estimate the molar residual entropy.

Solution.

With Ω0=(3/2)N\Omega_0 = (3/2)^N:

Sres=kBln⁡ ⁣(32)N=NkBln⁡ ⁣(32).S_{\mathrm{res}} = k_{\mathrm B}\ln\!\left(\frac{3}{2}\right)^N = Nk_{\mathrm B}\ln\!\left(\frac{3}{2}\right).

Per mole:

Sres,m=Rln⁡ ⁣(32)=(8.314)ln⁡(1.5)=3.37 J mol−1 K−1.S_{\mathrm{res,m}} = R\ln\!\left(\frac{3}{2}\right) = (8.314)\ln(1.5) = 3.37\ \mathrm{J\,mol^{-1}\,K^{-1}}.

Result. The predicted residual entropy is 3.37 J mol−1 K−13.37\ \mathrm{J\,mol^{-1}\,K^{-1}}, in remarkable agreement with the experimental value of approximately 3.41 J mol−1 K−13.41\ \mathrm{J\,mol^{-1}\,K^{-1}}. The key insight is that Ω0\Omega_0 is not simply 2N2^N (two positions per H atom without constraints) but is reduced by the ice rules, which require exactly two short and two long O–H distances around each oxygen. Pauling’s combinatorial analysis captures this constraint, and the agreement with experiment confirms that the proton disorder in ice is well described by the ice rules even at the lowest accessible temperatures.

Concept Checks

  1. Why does Planck’s statement allow S(0)S(0) to approach a constant without requiring that constant to be zero?

  2. What physical features distinguish an ideal crystal from a real crystal, and how do these features affect Ω0\Omega_0?

  3. How can a system have residual entropy without violating the third law?

  4. Why does the third law require CP→0C_P \to 0 as T→0T \to 0, and how is this consistent with the quantum heat capacities derived in Section 2.6?

  5. In the Pauling ice model, why is Ω0=(3/2)N\Omega_0 = (3/2)^N rather than 2N2^N or 1?

Key Takeaways