Course-wide Conventions & Notation
Overview and Learning Objectives¶
Molecular partition functions extend the canonical framework from a single particle to many particles, and then to molecules with internal degrees of freedom. This section shows how distinguishability affects counting (and therefore ), introduces the correction for identical particles, and motivates factorization into translational, rotational, vibrational, and electronic contributions.
In Sections 2.2 and 2.3, we derived the canonical partition function and ensemble averages for single-particle systems. Here we extend these ideas to closed systems of many identical, independent particles with internal degrees of freedom. We also introduce indistinguishability, which is central to quantum statistical mechanics.
Learning objectives:
Count many-particle microstates for distinguishable vs. indistinguishable particles under the stated single-occupancy assumption.
Derive the factorized form for independent (distinguishable) particles and for identical indistinguishable particles.
Explain why indistinguishability is essential for obtaining extensive thermodynamics (avoiding the Gibbs paradox).
Write the molecular partition function as within the Born–Oppenheimer approximation.
Core Ideas and Derivations¶
Partition Function for Distinguishable Particles¶
Two Distinguishable Particles in a Four-State System
The -particle microstates of a system of two distinguishable particles in a four-state system are listed in the table below:
-Particle Microstate | One-Particle Microstate 1 | One-Particle Microstate 2 | One-Particle Microstate 3 | One-Particle Microstate 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
I | a | b | ||
II | a | b | ||
III | a | b | ||
IV | a | b | ||
V | a | b | ||
VI | a | b | ||
VII | b | a | ||
VIII | b | a | ||
IX | b | a | ||
X | b | a | ||
XI | b | a | ||
XII | b | a |
There are 12 -particle microstates in this example.
Here, we treat each of the four one-particle states as an exclusive “slot,” so two distinguishable particles must occupy different states, yielding arrangements rather than .
More generally, for distinguishable particles in a system with one-particle microstates (single occupancy), the number of -particle microstates is the number of permutations of particles in states:
This assumes no more than one particle per one-particle state.
The energy of an -particle microstate is the sum of the one-particle energies for the occupied states:
Here index the one-particle microstates occupied by particles , and indexes the corresponding -particle microstate of the system.
The canonical partition function for distinguishable, independent particles is given by the sum over all possible microstates:
where , , and are the canonical partition functions for the particles , , and , respectively.
If the particles share the same one-particle spectrum so that , then
Partition Function for Indistinguishable Particles¶
Two Indistinguishable Particles in a Four-State System
The -particle microstates of a system of two indistinguishable particles in a four-state system are listed in the table below:
-Particle Microstate | One-Particle Microstate 1 | One-Particle Microstate 2 | One-Particle Microstate 3 | One-Particle Microstate 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
I | x | x | ||
II | x | x | ||
III | x | x | ||
IV | x | x | ||
V | x | x | ||
VI | x | x |
There are 6 -particle microstates in this example.
In general, for indistinguishable particles in a system with one-particle microstates (single occupancy), the number of -particle microstates is the number of combinations of particles in states:
This assumes no more than one particle per one-particle state.
If the particles are indistinguishable and identical, we can write the canonical partition function as
Partition Function for Molecules¶
Within the Born–Oppenheimer approximation, the total energy of a molecule is given by the sum of the translational, rotational, vibrational, and electronic energies:
where , , , and are the indices of the (one-degree-of-freedom) microstates of the translational, rotational, vibrational, and electronic energies, respectively, and is the index of the (many-degree-of-freedom) microstate of the molecule.
The canonical partition function for a molecule is given by the sum over all possible microstates:
where , , , and are the canonical partition functions for the translational, rotational, vibrational, and electronic energies, respectively.
Worked Example¶
Counting microstates and the factor (single occupancy)¶
Two particles occupy one-particle microstates, with at most one particle per microstate.
Distinguishable particles
The number of distinct arrangements (permutations) is
Indistinguishable particles
Exchanging labels does not create a new microstate, so
Connection to partition functions
If each allowed arrangement has the same energy , then the canonical partition function is proportional to the count:
Result. The factor corrects overcounting for identical particles and changes the thermodynamics derived from .
Concept Checks¶
What physical experiment would fail to distinguish two microstates that differ only by swapping particle labels?
Why does factorize for independent particles but not for interacting particles?
What assumption about occupancy is built into the combinatorial formulas in this section?
How would the counting change if multiple occupancy were allowed?
Key Takeaways¶
Counting microstates depends on whether particles are distinguishable.
For identical particles, corrects overcounting and yields consistent extensive properties.
Molecular energies often separate into translation/rotation/vibration/electronic parts, motivating .
Partition functions are bookkeeping devices: changes in counting change and therefore the thermodynamics.